Integrating Surakarta local wisdom into character education: A quantitative study in elementary schools

Authors

  • Waluyo Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Firdaus Himawan Raharjo Sekolah Tinggi Islam Kendal, Indonesia Author
  • M. Nurkhafiq Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Ridwan Abdul Wahab Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Irhamuddin Mahmud Universitas Muhammadiyah Karangkanyar, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i1.54

Keywords:

Character education, Elementary school students, Local wisdom, Surakarta culture, Surakarta local wisdom

Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which local wisdom predicts the multidimensional character development of elementary school students within a culturally grounded educational context. Despite increasing global emphasis on character education, empirical evidence remains limited regarding how culturally embedded values can be operationalized as measurable predictors of specific character outcomes. Addressing this gap, the study employs a quantitative cross-sectional design involving 300 students selected through stratified random sampling in Surakarta, Indonesia. Data were collected using psychometrically validated instruments measuring local wisdom and four character dimensions: religiosity, responsibility, tolerance, and environmental concern. Multiple regression analysis reveals that local wisdom significantly predicts all dimensions, with the strongest effect on religiosity (β = 0.55, R² = 0.30), followed by responsibility (β = 0.48, R² = 0.24), tolerance (β = 0.40, R² = 0.16), and environmental concern (β = 0.32, R² = 0.10). These findings demonstrate a systematic gradient in which culturally reinforced values are more effectively internalized than those requiring complex behavioral enactment. This study is among the first to empirically validate a multidimensional and culturally specific model that integrates local wisdom into a statistically robust framework of character development. The results extend existing theoretical perspectives by introducing cultural intensity and behavioral complexity as key mechanisms shaping value internalization and action. Practically, the study highlights the need to complement cultural integration with experiential and action-oriented pedagogies, particularly for behavior-driven character domains. Overall, the findings reposition local wisdom as a measurable and strategically significant foundation for designing contextually responsive and globally relevant character education systems.

References

Asghar, J., Kanbach, D. K., & Kraus, S. (2025). Toward a multidimensional concept of organizational agility: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 76(1), 885–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00497-6

Bianchi, G., Testa, F., Boiral, O., & Iraldo, F. (2022). Organizational learning for environmental sustainability: Internalizing lifecycle management. Organization & Environment, 35(1), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026621998744

Druker-Ibáñez, S., & Cáceres-Jensen, L. (2022). Integration of indigenous and local knowledge into sustainability education: A systematic literature review. Environmental Education Research, 28(8), 1209–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2083081

Gebremedhin, M., Gebrewahd, E., & Stafford, L. K. (2022). Validity and reliability study of clinician attitude towards rural health extension program in Ethiopia: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1088. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08470-9

Haq, S. N. (2024). The effects of urbanization on traditional family structures. Journal of Social Signs Review, 2(3), 70–79.

Houser, N. O. (2023). Understanding the loss of public education: A critical ecological perspective on systemic challenges in school and society. Critical Education, 14(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v14i2.186406

Hummel, S. (2025). Ethical and responsible AI in education: Situated ethics for democratic learning. Education Sciences, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121594

Jiang, G., Tan, X., Wang, H., Xu, M., & Wu, X. (2023). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identify three structural dimensions for measuring physical function in community-dwelling older adults. PeerJ, 11, e15182. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15182

Jobst, L. J., Bader, M., & Moshagen, M. (2023). A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000423

Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., & Kacetl, J. (2023). Ethical issues of the use of AI-driven mobile apps for education. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1118116

Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614

Lerner, R. M., Bornstein, M. H., & Jervis, P. (2021). The development of positive attributes of character: On the embodiment of specificity, holism, and self-system processes. Human Development, 66(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521583

Mahaswa, R. K., & Syaja, A. (2025). Questioning local wisdom in Indonesian indigenous research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 112, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.001

Mohd Hashim, N. N. D., Zain, A., Mohd Basir, J., & Salleh, N. A. S. (2026). The impact and main components of ethnopedagogy practice in culture literature: A scoping review. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2025.2611387

Mustaghfiroh, A., Manshur, U., & Mubaroq, M. S. (2025). Islamic religious pedagogy and affective literacy: Constructing socio-emotional education frameworks. Indonesian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijess.v4i2.12803

Najafov, R. (2025). Socio-psychological determinants of moral and value formation in educational contexts: A meta-analytical study of youth behavior, ethical consciousness, and the interplay between education and society. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5453775

Ngiu, Z., Laila, N. Q., Panai, A. H., Yunus, R., & Cuga, C. (2023). Strengthening civic education in a multicultural school: A local wisdom approach. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (108), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2023.108.012

Nikolic, S., Sandison, C., Haque, R., Daniel, S., Grundy, S., Belkina, M., Lyden, S., Hassan, G. M., & Neal, P. (2024). ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: An updated multi-institutional study. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 126–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2372154

Nurmaya, A., Ramli, M., Atmoko, A., & Akbar, S. (2026). Integrating local wisdom into moral and character education to foster students’ moral reasoning: An embedded mixed-methods study. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 74–88. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v11i1.3139

Pate, A., Riley, R. D., Collins, G. S., van Smeden, M., Van Calster, B., Ensor, J., & Martin, G. P. (2023). Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 32(3), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802231151220

Seabrook, J. A. (2025). Powering nutrition research: Practical strategies for sample size in multiple regression. Nutrients, 17(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17162668

Sudirman, S., Sumarni, W., & Rahayuningsih, M. (2025). Students’ understanding and attitudes toward environmental conservation based on local wisdom. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(11), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i11.12479

Suhaeb, F. W., Tamrin, S., & Najamuddin, N. (2024). Dynamics of social integration in sustainable development: A case study in urban multicultural societies. Kurdish Studies, 12(1), 4102–4111.

Zahid, R. A., & Darmawan, D. (2025). Reconceptualizing digital literacy dimensions as predictors of academic engagement and success. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 7(3), 18–24.

Zhou, X., Liu, G., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026). A five-step AI-information problem solving (AI-IPS) model for critical, ethical, and responsible usage. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2026.2614080

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28