Media framing and the legitimation of repressive and persuasive policing in protest movements: A gamson–modigliani and rsa–isa analysis

Asrul M Mustaqim; Udi Rusadi; Sadakita Br Karo; Yuyun Rahmawati

doi:10.53515/alqodiri.v24i1.49

Authors

Asrul M Mustaqim Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Udi Rusadi Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Sadakita Br Karo Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta, Indonesia Author
Yuyun Rahmawati Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i1.49

Keywords:

Demonstrations, Gamson and Modigliani, ISA, Media framing, Police, RSA

Abstract

In contemporary democracies, the legitimacy of protest and state authority is increasingly shaped not only through direct confrontation but through mediated discourse, raising critical questions about how meaning, power, and control are constructed in the public sphere. This study reconceptualizes media framing as an ideological mechanism that actively produces and stabilizes state legitimacy by examining representations of repressive and persuasive policing in protest coverage. Drawing on an integrated framework combining framing theory with Althusser’s concepts of Repressive State Apparatus and Ideological State Apparatus, this research employs a qualitative critical interpretive approach to analyze 24 news articles from leading Indonesian online media during protests surrounding the revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law and the Draft Criminal Code. The findings reveal a systematic discursive pattern in which demonstrations are reframed from democratic expressions into problems of disorder, privileging narratives of conflict while marginalizing political grievances. Within this structure, the police are consistently constructed as legitimate protectors, whereas demonstrators are positioned as sources of instability through delegitimizing language, visual cues, and causal narratives. The study further demonstrates how external actors are strategically invoked to explain violence and how persuasive policing is discursively framed as ineffective, thereby normalizing the transition toward coercive intervention. These results challenge the conventional view of media as neutral intermediaries and establish framing as a structural site where ideology and coercion converge. By advancing a critical synthesis of framing and state theory, this study contributes a novel conceptual perspective to global scholarship on media and power, demonstrating that legitimacy is dynamically produced through discursive alignment rather than inherently possessed by state institutions

References

Asad, M. M., & Zia, S. (2025). Impact media portrays on police legitimacy in times of emergencies: A global perspective. International Journal of Emergency Services, 14(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-05-2024-0036

Baranauskas, A. J. (2022). News media and public attitudes toward the protests of 2020: An examination of the mediating role of perceived protester violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12569

Bonner, M. D., & Dammert, L. (2022). Constructing police legitimacy during protests: Frames and consequences for human rights. Policing and Society, 32(5), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1957887

Cobo, M. J., De Mascellis, A. M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2026). Automatic temporal framing detection for news analysis. Quality & Quantity, 60(2), 5063–5085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02492-1

Coleman, M. L., Ragan, M., & Dari, T. (2024). Intercoder reliability for use in qualitative research and evaluation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 57(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2024.2303715

Culver, K. B., & McLeod, D. M. (2023). “Anti-riot” or “anti-protest” legislation? Black Lives Matter, news framing, and the protest paradigm. Journalism and Media, 4(1), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4010015

Das, R., & Singh, T. D. (2022). A multi-stage multimodal framework for sentiment analysis of Assamese in low resource setting. Expert Systems with Applications, 204, 117575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117575

Dodge, J., & Metze, T. (2024). Approaches to policy framing: Deepening a conversation across perspectives. Policy Sciences, 57(2), 221–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09534-9

Fernandes, E. G., & Silva, M. K. (2024). Controlling protest: Repertoire, strategies, and lessons from policing the 2013–2014 protests cycle. Dados, 67, e20220006. https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2024.67.4.334x

Geise, S., & Xu, Y. (2025). Effects of visual framing in multimodal media environments: A systematic review of studies between 1979 and 2023. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 102(3), 796–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241257586

Guenther, L., Jörges, S., Mahl, D., & Brüggemann, M. (2024). Framing as a bridging concept for climate change communication: A systematic review based on 25 years of literature. Communication Research, 51(4), 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221137165

Harlow, S., & Bachmann, I. (2024). Police, violence, and the “logic of damage”: Comparing U.S. and Chilean media portrayals of protests. Mass Communication and Society, 27(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2186247

Hart, C. (2023). Frames, framing and framing effects in cognitive CDA. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231155071

Hasan, M. Z., & Al-Zaman, M. S. (2026). Government repression, newsroom failures, and trauma: The price of journalism during movements in authoritarian regimes. Journalism Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2026.2623422

Ibrahim, S. N. A., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2025). The validity of the Malaysian teachers’ global competency level instrument using Cohen’s kappa, content validity ratio and content validity index analyses. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 7(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.asci3848

Kadri, J. (2023). Comparing the two “Cold Wars” through Gramsci, Althusser and Mao. https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10115

Kermani, H. (2025). Framing the pandemic on Persian Twitter: Gauging networked frames by topic modeling. American Behavioral Scientist, 69(10), 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231207078

KhosraviNik, M. (2022). Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1835683

Martinisi, A. (2026). Reconstructing reality: How radical constructivism unravels echo chambers in online platforms. Constructivist Foundations, 21(1), 41–49.

McGrath, R. (2025). Construct validity in action: A case-based method for model testing in sovereign investment and health systems. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251378862. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251378862

Merkebu, J., Geringer, J., & Samuel, A. (2025). Sampling thoughtfully in qualitative research: Hallmarks of rigour in health professions education. The Clinical Teacher, 22(4), e70145. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70145

Mtisi, S. (2022). The qualitative case study research strategy as applied on a rural enterprise development doctoral research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221145849. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221145849

Ozuem, W., Willis, M., Ranfagni, S., & Omeish, F. (2025). Thematic analysis in an artificial intelligence-driven context: A stage-by-stage process. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251362982. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251362982

Paraná, E., Trindade, L., & Pimenta, A. M. (2026). From Althusser to Foucault and back: State, discipline and governmentality in the crisis of neoliberalism. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-bja10099

Peng, Y., Lock, I., & Ali Salah, A. (2024). Automated visual analysis for the study of social media effects: Opportunities, approaches, and challenges. Communication Methods and Measures, 18(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2023.2277956

Proust, V., & Saldaña, M. (2022). Another violent protest? New perspectives to understand protest coverage. Media and Communication, 10(4), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5796

Rahim, K., Fatima, S. M., & Nazir, S. (2023). Ideology and state apparatuses (ISAs and RSAs): A Marxist study of A Case of Exploding Mangoes by Mohammad Hanif. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-IV)18

Roslyng, M. M., & Dindler, C. (2023). Media power and politics in framing and discourse theory. Communication Theory, 33(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac012

Sablina, L. (2026). Disinformation as repression signaling: The cost of dissent in Russia. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2026.2624637

Siahaan, J. R., Pagalung, G., Demmallino, E. B., Saleng, A., Sulaiman, A. A., & Nagu, N. (2025). Reframing sustainability in post-mining landscapes: A foundational framework for institutional and behavioral integration in Indonesia. Sustainability, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125278

Stott, C., Hassan, S., Mabry, D., Dyer, S., & Straub, K. (2026). The Columbus model: Crowd psychology, dialogue policing and protest management in the U.S.A. Policing and Society, 36(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2025.2532546

van Dijk, T. A. (2023). Analyzing frame analysis: A critical review of framing studies in social movement research. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231155080

Wilson, J. (2025). Interpretive description and reflexive thematic analysis: Exploring conceptual coherence and methodological integrity. Qualitative Health Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251378303

Yusnaini, Y., Nufus, H., Saleh, R., & Wibowo, W. A. S. (2025). The digital era and the evolution of media paradigms: A critical review of the adaptation of old media in new media ecosystems. Society, 13(1), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.853