Good governance of zakat: Constitutional legitimacy of BAZNAS from the perspective of islamic economics

Authors

  • Bobby Ferly Institut Agama Islam Imam Syafii Indonesia Author
  • Ade Sofyan Mulazid UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author
  • Supriyono UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author
  • Athia Nur Kamilah Universiti Utara Malaysia Author
  • Bahrul Yaman UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author
  • Cut Erika UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i1.37

Keywords:

BAZNAS, Constitutional Legitimacy, Good Governance, Islamic Economics, Maqasid al-Shariah, Zakat Governance

Abstract

The growing significance of Islamic social finance has intensified scholarly attention toward zakat institutions as strategic instruments for socio-economic development, particularly in relation to governance quality and institutional legitimacy. This study aims to systematically examine the relationship between constitutional legitimacy and good governance within the context of zakat management, with a specific focus on the National Board of Zakat (BAZNAS) from an Islamic economics perspective. Employing a qualitative design through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), this study follows the PRISMA framework to identify, screen, and analyze 50 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus published between 2015 and 2025. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis supported by structured coding to identify patterns in governance dimensions, legitimacy constructs, and theoretical frameworks. The findings reveal that good governance, characterized by transparency, accountability, and effectiveness, serves as the central determinant of institutional credibility and zakat compliance. While constitutional legitimacy provides a formal legal foundation, it does not automatically ensure public trust; instead, legitimacy is dynamically constructed through governance performance. The study further highlights the mediating role of trust in linking governance practices to compliance behavior, as well as the emerging significance of digital transformation and SDG alignment in strengthening institutional impact. Theoretically, this study integrates Institutional Theory with Maqasid al-Shariah to propose a more comprehensive framework for zakat governance. In conclusion, the effectiveness and sustainability of zakat institutions depend on the continuous alignment between legal authority, governance quality, and ethical principles, positioning zakat as both a religious obligation and a strategic tool for sustainable socio-economic development.

References

Abdul-Rahman, A., Nor, S. M., & Yaacob, S. E. (2023). Technological integration within zakat institutions: A comprehensive review and prospective research directions. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 24, 31–43.

Al Haq, M. A. (2019). The maqasid al shariah and the sustainability paradigm: Literature review and proposed mutual framework for asnaf development. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies. https://www.academia.edu/download/71372853/645.pdf

Antlöv, H., Ibrahim, R., & Van Tuijl, P. (2006). NGO governance and accountability in Indonesia: Challenges in a newly democratizing country. In NGO accountability. Routledge.

Awa, H. O., Etim, W., & Ogbonda, E. (2024). Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y

Aziz, Y., Mansor, F., Waqar, S., & Haji Abdullah, L. (2020). The nexus between zakat and poverty reduction: Is the effective utilization of zakat necessary for achieving SDGs? A multidimensional poverty index approach. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 14(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12212

Baehaqi, A., Chariri, A., & Prabowo, T. J. W. (2025). The governance of zakat institutions: A meta-narrative review. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 15(2), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i2.39656

Balarabe, K. (2025). Rethinking institutional legitimacy and the future of responsive governance. Jindal Global Law Review, 16(2), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-025-00282-2

Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., Aziz, S. A., & Sarea, A. (2020). Zakah compliance in Muslim countries: An economic and socio-psychological perspective. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(3), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2020-0057

Chu, Z., Xu, J., Lai, F., & Collins, B. J. (2018). Institutional theory and environmental pressures: The moderating effect of market uncertainty on innovation and firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2794453

David, P., & Kochhar, R. (1996). Barriers to effective corporate governance by institutional investors: Implications for theory and practice. European Management Journal, 14(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(96)00039-4

Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7

Farisi, M. F. I. (2023). Maqasid al-shariah: A holistic approach to wealth management in the 21st century. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Farisi-3/publication/378236318

Galleli, B., & Amaral, L. (2026). Bridging institutional theory and social and environmental efforts in management: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 52(1), 42–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251322429

Haggart, B., & Keller, C. I. (2021). Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance. Telecommunications Policy, 45(6), 102152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102152

Hanif, M., & Ayub, M. (2022). Islamic financial services industry: Aspirations and achievements. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(1), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12406

Hansen, R. K. (2023). Applying a stakeholder management approach to ethics in charitable fundraising. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 28(4), e1731. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1731

Jin, B. E., & Kim, G. (2021). Assessing Malaysia and Indonesia as emerging retail markets: An institution-based view. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(6), 692–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-05-2020-0187

Lee, L. Y. Y., Xia, J. K. P., & Kee, D. M. H. (2025). Advancing sustainability reporting in ASEAN: Insights from a systematic review (2019–2023). Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(4), 5238–5257. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3251

Malik, B. A. (2016). Philanthropy in practice: Role of zakat in the realization of justice and economic growth. International Journal of Zakat, 1(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v1i1.7

Mat Daud, M. S., & Wahid, H. (2025). Assessing the role of zakat institutions in the socio-economic sustainability of the poor and destitute in Malaysia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 45(11–12), 1121–1136. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2025-0036

Megawati, D., & Zulkifli, Z. (2025). Sharia auditing in zakat institutions: Challenges and prospects in Indonesia. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 14(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v14i1.26059

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

Mukhlishin, M., Wahab, A., Setiaji, B., & Tazhdinov, M. (2024). Zakat maal management and regulation practices: Evidence from Malaysia, Turkey, and Indonesia. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(2), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i2.204

Mustafida, R., Kurnia, Z. N., Fauziah, N. N., Subri, N. S. B., & Faiz, F. (2020). The implementation of maqasid shariah in zakat institution: Comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 6(2), 317.

Nieuwenhuis, J. (2022). Neighborhood and community effects in East and Southeast Asia: A systematic review and meta-analytical exploration of publication bias. Asian Journal of Social Science, 50(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2022.07.001

Nurhasanah, N. (2023). Zakat & sustainable development goals (SDGs): A review. https://journals.smartinsight.id/index.php/EII/article/view/275

Öztürk, A. (2024). Problems with the right to legitimacy. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 1(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.010240767

Qamruzzaman, M., Farzana, N., & Mindia, P. M. (2025). Fostering sustainable giving: An extended theory of planned behavior approach to zakat payment intentions in Bangladesh. Discover Psychology, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00546-x

Qutaiba, M., Owais, M., & Muharam, A. S. (2024). The current issue of reporting zakat in Indonesia: A critical analysis. Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Research, 4(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiebr.v4i1.227

Rahman, A. A., & Mustapha, R. (2025). Challenges faced by zakat institutions in implementing technology-based governance: A qualitative study of managerial perspectives. Journal of Organizational Management and Strategic Studies, 1(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17861759

Risi, D., Vigneau, L., Bohn, S., & Wickert, C. (2023). Institutional theory-based research on corporate social responsibility: Bringing values back in. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12299

Rusanti, E., & Anwar, M. M. (2025). Unlocking zakat compliance: Extending the theory of planned behavior with trust in zakat institutions as a moderator. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2024-0455

Sawmar, A. A., & Mohammed, M. O. (2021). Enhancing zakat compliance through good governance: A conceptual framework. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-10-2018-0116

Schiavi, G. S., Behr, A., & Marcolin, C. B. (2024). Institutional theory in accounting information systems research: Shedding light on digital transformation and institutional change. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 52, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100662

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Syamsuri, S., Sa’adah, Y., & Roslan, I. A. (2022). Reducing public poverty through optimization of zakat funding as an effort to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(1), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i1.3872

Tufani, J. A. (2024). Stakeholder perspectives on mosque management and accountability: A stakeholder theory approach. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(4), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i4.824

Zami, M. T. Z., & Nurhaida, H. S. (2025). Establishing criteria for zakat collectors in the management of zakat fitrah funds. International Journal of Social Science and Religion, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v6i1.291

Zheng, Y. (2011). Credibility and flexibility: Political institutions, governance, and foreign direct investment. International Interactions, 37(3), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2011.596008

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29