Hybrid Digital-Conventional Leadership Model and Its Influence on the Well-Being and Performance of the Academic Community

Authors

  • Pipin Sukandi Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia Author
  • Neuneung Ratna Hayati Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia Author
  • Vina Silviani Marinda Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i1.103

Keywords:

Hybrid Leadership; Psychological Well-being; AcademicCommunity Performance.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital transformation in higher education, creating an urgent need for leaders who can effectively integrate digital technologies with conventional leadership approaches. However, many leaders still struggle to balance digital efficiency with relational effectiveness, which negatively affects the well-being and performance of the academic community.

This study examines the effects of a hybrid leadership model, which combines digital and conventional leadership approaches, on the psychological well-being and performance of the academic community in Indonesian higher education institutions. In addition, the study investigates the mediating role of well-being in the relationship between leadership and performance.

The study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected from 200–300 respondents using stratified random sampling through validated instruments, including the MLQ-5X, PERMA Profiler, DASS-21, and the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to test the proposed hypotheses. Furthermore, qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to enrich the interpretation of the quantitative findings.

The results supported all four hypotheses. Hybrid leadership significantly and positively influenced both psychological well-being (H1) and academic performance (H2). Well-being also demonstrated a significant positive effect on performance (H3). Moreover, well-being partially mediated the relationship between hybrid leadership and performance (H4), indicating that leadership contributes to performance both directly and indirectly through the enhancement of well-being.

Overall, the findings suggest that hybrid leadership effectively improves both well-being and performance in higher education institutions. Therefore, higher education leaders should develop dual competencies by strengthening digital fluency while maintaining authentic interpersonal leadership skills. In addition, institutions should integrate well-being initiatives into their performance management systems as a strategic component of sustainable organizational development.

References

Agustina, I., & Kurniawati, D. T. (2024). Knowledge Management in The Digital Era in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Business Innovation, Economics and Social Science, 1(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijbiess.v11p60-63

Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2021). Associations between traditional and digital leadership in academic environment: During the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01286

Banda, P., & Czako, K. (2025). Measuring mental well-being in digitally transforming higher education : a conceptual framework. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2025-0494

Dr. Ayaz Qaiser, Iram Arshad, Muhammad Ali Baig, Chaudhry Yasir Mehmood, & Muhammad Atif Sheikh. (2025). Digital Leadership and Employee Thriving in Hybrid Universities: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety and the Moderating Effect of AI Readiness. Research Journal for Social Affairs, 3(6), 1595–1606. https://doi.org/10.71317/rjsa.003.06.0646

Gunawan, A., Kusumah, D. H., Nurmalasari, D., & Bangsa, U. P. (2026). How Digital Leadership Drives Innovation and Collaboration in Higher Education : The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. 14(2), 153–164.

Jing, M., Guo, Z., Wu, X., Yang, Z., & Wang, X. (2025). Higher Education Digital Academic Leadership: Perceptions and Practices from Chinese University Leaders. Education Sciences, 15(5), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050606

Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6

Majid Kamran. (2025). Educational Leadership in a Digital Era: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities. AL-ĪMĀN Research Journal, 3(01), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.63283/54wxa275

Nzarubara, V. (2025). Subjective Well-being in the midst of Digital Transformation among academic staff in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences, 13(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37082/ijirmps.v13.i6.232763

Poh, C. T., Ni Nyoman Parwati, Ketut Agustini, & I Made Tegeh. (2025). Tri Dharma As a Catalyst for Moral Literacy and Ethical Mindset: a Review of Contemporary Indonesian Educational and Cultural Discourses. QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, 3(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v3i2.663

Syamsuddin, S., Alim, N., & Salbiyah, N. A. (2025). The Mapping of Digital Culture Among Higher Education Lecturers in Indonesia (A Multisite Study). Ta’dib, 28(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v28i1.13915

Terania, L. (2023). A Review on Developing Digital Leadership: Assessing Strategies and Implications to Generate Links for Promoting Digital Leadership in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 1(4), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2023.0028

Wati, C. R., Brawijaya, U., Bali, P. N., & Jember, P. N. (2025). International Conference of. 383–399.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30