The Influence of Discovery Learning Strategy on Learning Engagement and Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Online Learning

Abuddar; Chusnul Muali

doi:10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.67

Authors

Abuddar Universitas Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo, Indonesia Author
Chusnul Muali Universitas Nurul Jadid Paiton Probolinggo, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.67

Keywords:

Asynchronous online learning , Discovery learning, Knowledge construction , Learning engagement

Abstract

Asynchronous online learning offers flexibility in time and pace; however, it is frequently associated with low student engagement and superficial knowledge construction. This study aims to examine the effect of discovery learning strategies on students’ learning engagement and knowledge construction in an asynchronous learning environment. A quantitative quasi-experimental design with a posttest-only control group was employed, involving 64 tenth-grade students of SMA Nurul Jadid, divided into an experimental group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 32). The experimental group engaged with Moodle-based modules structured according to discovery learning stages, while the control group used conventional expository modules over four learning sessions on the topic of prayer. Data were collected using an adapted Student Engagement Scale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87) and an analytical rubric to assess knowledge construction (inter-rater reliability = 0.85). Multivariate analysis (MANOVA) revealed a significant difference between the groups (Pillai’s Trace = 0.520; F(2, 61) = 33.006; p < 0.001). Univariate results indicated that the experimental group achieved higher learning engagement (M = 82.45, SD = 6.12) than the control group (M = 70.10, SD = 7.45), F(1, 62) = 52.505; p < 0.001, and demonstrated superior knowledge construction (M = 85.20, SD = 5.89) compared to the control group (M = 72.35, SD = 8.10), F(1, 62) = 52.680; p < 0.001. These findings conclude that discovery learning is an effective instructional strategy for enhancing engagement and fostering deeper, more meaningful knowledge construction in asynchronous online learning environments.

References

Alanazi, A. A., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2024). Effect of scaffolding strategies and guided discovery on higher-order thinking skills in physics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2496. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14980

Alanazi, A. A., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2025). Development of technology-enhanced higher order thinking learning module based on scaffolding and guided discovery approaches. In 2024 Yearbook Emerging Technologies in Learning (pp. 485-509). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80388-8_26

AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics, 12(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953

Alhazbi, S., & Hasan, M. A. (2021). The Role of Self-Regulation in Remote Emergency Learning: Comparing Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning. Sustainability, 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911070

Arghode, V., Brieger, E., & Wang, J. (2018). Engaging instructional design and instructor role in online learning environment. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(7–8), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2017-0110

Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

Brau, B. (2016). Constructivism. https://pressbooks.pub/ipthandbook/chapter/constructivism/

Cain, M., Sheehan, H., & Taouk, S. (2024). “It doesn’t feel like we’ve had the chance to really connect”. The crucial need for social presence in fully asynchronous teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, 104789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104789

Cakir, M. (2022). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education.

Chen, B., Chang, Y.-H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.002

Cheung, S. K. S., Kwok, L. F., Phusavat, K., & Yang, H. H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1

Chusni, M. M., Saputro, S., Suranto, & Rahardjo, S. B. (2020). The potential of discovery learning models to empower students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1464(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1464/1/012036

Collıns, K., Groff, S., Mathena, C., & Kupczynskı, L. (2019). Asynchronous Video and the Development of Instructor Social Presence and Student Engagement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.522378

Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity. Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01

Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z

de-Marcos, L., Garcia-Lopez, E., & Garcia-Cabot, A. (2016). On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education, 95, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.008

Eggers, J. H., Oostdam, R., & Voogt, J. (2021). Self-regulation strategies in blended learning environments in higher education: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6453

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4

Ena, T. A. B., Tangi, H. C., & Lawung, Y. D. (2024). Analysis of Learning Outcomes of Buffer Solution Materials through the Discovery Learning Approach in Vocational High Schools. Journal of Social Studies Arts and Humanities (JSSAH), 4(3), 098. https://doi.org/10.33751/jssah.v4i3.12835

Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554

Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692

Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235

Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

Ho, Y. (2024). Enhance adult students’ online knowledge construction: Exploring effective instructional designs and addressing barriers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1675–1689. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12983

Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z

Lan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5

Lee, L. (2021). Exploring Self-Regulated Learning Through Flipped Instruction with Digital Technologies: An Intermediate Spanish Course. In Language Education in Digital Spaces: Perspectives on Autonomy and Interaction (pp. 39–59). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74958-3_3

Lethulur, N. D., Juandi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2025). The Effectiveness of Discovery, Inquiry, Problem, and Project-Based Learning in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(1), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.pp268-279

Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. (2025). Agile-Blended Learning: An Innovative Technology-Mediated Approach to Distance Education. SN Computer Science, 6(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03646-y

Mansour, N. (2024). Students’ and facilitators’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous online dialogic discussions and e-facilitation in understanding the Nature of Science. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15965–15997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12473-w

Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade. Electronics, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832

Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147

Mcguire, M. (2026). Reclaiming pedagogy in virtual learning environments: Educator and student perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2026.2614964

Moorhouse, B. L., & Wong, K. M. (2022). Blending asynchronous and synchronous digital technologies and instructional approaches to facilitate remote learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00195-8

Nadjamuddin, L., Rore, I., Mahmud, J., Zaky, M., Tadeko, N., & Nirmala, B. (2026). Effectiveness of Hybrid Discovery Learning in Enhancing Students' Comprehension and Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v20i01.57485

Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). Self-Regulated and Mobile-Mediated Learning in Blended Tertiary Education Environments: Student Insights from a Pilot Study. Sustainability, 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612284

Nückles, M., Roelle, J., Glogger-Frey, I., Waldeyer, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). The Self-Regulation-View in Writing-to-Learn: Using Journal Writing to Optimize Cognitive Load in Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1089–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09541-1

Okoye, K., Rodriguez-Tort, J. A., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Technology-mediated teaching and learning process: A conceptual study of educators’ response amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7225–7257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10527-x

Osborne, D. M., Byrne, J. H., Massey, D. L., & Johnston, A. N. B. (2018). Use of online asynchronous discussion boards to engage students, enhance critical thinking, and foster staff-student/student-student collaboration: A mixed method study. Nurse Education Today, 70, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.014

Ouyang, F., & Chang, Y.-H. (2019). The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1396–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12647

Ozdem-Yilmaz, Y., & Bilican, K. (2025). Discovery Learning—Jerome Bruner. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory (pp. 173–187). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81351-1_11

Rienties, B., Lewis, T., McFarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., & Toetenel, L. (2018). Analytics in online and offline language learning environments: The role of learning design to understand student online engagement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1401548

Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin. (2019). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966

Siregar, T. (2025). The Effectiveness of the Discovery Learning Model in Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills (No. 2025101549). Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202510.1549.v1

Soydan Oktay, Ö., & Yüzer, T. V. (2024). The analysis of interactive scenario design principles supporting critical and creative thinking in asynchronous learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4183–4204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2195443

Van Laer, S., & Elen, J. (2017). In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1395–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x

Varkey, T. C., Varkey, J. A., Ding, J. B., Varkey, P. K., Zeitler, C., Nguyen, A. M., Merhavy, Z. I., & Thomas, C. R. (2022). Asynchronous learning: A general review of best practices for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2022-0036

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3

Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student Engagement: Current State of the Construct, Conceptual Refinement, and Future Research Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3

Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist Learning Theory and Creating Effective Learning Environments. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Globalisation and Education Reforms: Creating Effective Learning Environments (pp. 35–50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3

Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678