Gender Analysis of Students Motivation to Learn in Social Studies Classes in Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.220Keywords:
Elementary School, Gender Representation, Learning Motivation, Qualitative Case Study, Social Studies EducationAbstract
Students’ learning motivation based on gender and its correlation with gender representation in social studies instruction have not been extensively studied, particularly at the elementary school level in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze students’ learning motivation based on gender and to examine the correlation between gender representation in social studies instruction and the learning motivation of elementary school students. This study employed a qualitative approach using a case study design conducted at an elementary school in Purwakarta Regency. The research subjects consisted of two teachers and four students selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation, then analyzed using the Miles & Huberman model with triangulation of techniques and sources to enhance data validity. Students’ learning motivation generally fell into the “good” category. Female students’ learning motivation was generally more stable, while male students’ motivation was more influenced by the learning methods used. Social studies curriculum content also revealed an imbalance in gender representation; males were more frequently depicted in the public sphere, while females were depicted in the domestic sphere. There is a relationship between gender representation in social studies instruction and students’ learning motivation; therefore, teachers and instructional material developers need to pay attention to balanced gender representation and the use of varied teaching methods.
References
Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ramirez-Arellano, A. (2022). Scaffolding matters? Investigating its role in motivation, engagement and learning achievements in higher education. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 13419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013419
Adams, D., Donovan, J., & Topple, C. (2021). Achieving sustainability in food manufacturing operations and their supply chains: Key insights from a systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1491–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.019
Asadpour, M., Bakhshi, M. H., Mirzapour, P., & Shahabi, M. (2025). The motivational role of teachers: A systematic review of key factors influencing students’ academic motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(4), Article 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-01039-0
Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. Routledge.
Boonsuk, Y., & Waelateh, B. (n.d.). Unequal Englishes and linguistic justice: Global Englishes and ideological transformation in Thai higher education. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70134
Borger, J. G., Longley, R. J., Taylor, M. F., Motrich, R., Payne, J. A., & Kemp, R. A. (2025). Global perspectives to enhance strategies for advancing women in healthcare and STEMM leadership. Immunology & Cell Biology, 103(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/imcb.12854
Chang, W.-C., & Viesca, K. M. (2022). Preparing teachers for culturally responsive/relevant pedagogy (CRP): A critical review of research. Teachers College Record, 124(2), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221086676
Coratella, G. (2022). Appropriate reporting of exercise variables in resistance training protocols: Much more than load and number of repetitions. Sports Medicine - Open, 8(1), Article 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00492-1
Córdova-Esparza, D.-M., Romero-González, J.-A., Córdova-Esparza, K.-E., Terven, J., & López-Martínez, R.-E. (2024). Active learning strategies in computer science education: A systematic review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(6), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8060050
Costa, A., Moreira, D., Casanova, J., Azevedo, Â., Gonçalves, A., Oliveira, Í., Azevedo, R., & Dias, P. C. (2024). Determinants of academic achievement from middle to secondary school education: A systematic review. Social Psychology of Education, 27(6), 3533–3572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09941-z
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crookes, G. V., & Ziegler, N. (2021). Critical language pedagogy and task-based language teaching: Reciprocal relationship and mutual benefit. Education Sciences, 11(6), Article 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060254
Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., Antony, F., & Wan, X. (2024). Motivate students for better academic achievement: A systematic review of blended innovative teaching and its impact on learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(4), e22733. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22733
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Egitim, S. (2022). Challenges of adapting to organizational culture: Internationalization through inclusive leadership and mutuality. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 5(1), Article 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100242
Erdogdu, F., & Erdogdu, E. (2025). Beyond rankings: A multidimensional analysis of factors shaping student achievement in the PISA 2022 dataset. Educational Review, 77(5), 1585–1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2025.2506807
Fawaid, A., & Handayani, P. (2025). Visualizing inequality: Uncovering gender bias in Islamic textbooks of Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2593342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2593342
Fithriani, R. (2022a). Gender portrayals in Indonesian and international English language textbooks for primary students: A critical image analysis. MEXTESOL Journal, 46(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1374048
Fithriani, R. (2022b). Gender stereotypes in educational texts: A comparative study of Indonesian and international primary English textbooks. Discourse and Interaction, 15(2), 53–76.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Gjylbegaj, V., & Radwan, A. F. (2025). Portrayal of gender roles in Emirati television dramas: A content analysis. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, Article 1506875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1506875
Grimshaw, L., Jackson, S., Littlefair, D., & Melling, A. (2024). Experiences of men in the minority: Understanding men’s sense of belonging studying primary education, nursing and social work in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 48(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2263384
Hennebry-Leung, M., & Xiao, H. A. (2023). Examining the role of the learner and the teacher in language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820938810
Hossain, K. I. (2024). Literature-based language learning: Challenges and opportunities for English learners. Ampersand, 13, Article 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100201
Ishida, A., & Sekiyama, T. (2024). Variables influencing students’ learning motivation: Critical literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1445011. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1445011
Kumar, A. A. (2021). Semantic memory: A review of methods, models, and current challenges. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(1), 40–80. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01792-x
Lemieux, A. (2024). “Back then it was only men who worked in these kinds of fields”: Observing little sparks through the prism of affect and gender in maker literacies research. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(3), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.525
Levy, B. L. M., Busey, C. L., Cuenca, A., Evans, R. W., Halvorsen, A.-L., Ho, L.-C., Kahne, J., Kissling, M. T., Lo, J. C., McAvoy, P., & McGrew, S. (2023). Social studies education research for sustainable democratic societies: Addressing persistent civic challenges. Theory & Research in Social Education, 51(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2158149
Lo, N. P.-K. (2024). Cross-cultural comparative analysis of student motivation and autonomy in learning: Perspectives from Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1393968. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1393968
Majadly, H., & Haj Yahya, A. (2024). Beyond the language: Arabic language textbooks in Arab–Palestinian society as tools for developing social–emotional skills. Education Sciences, 14(10), Article 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101088
Martin, A. E., & Fisher-Ari, T. R. (2021). “If we don’t have diversity, there’s no future to see”: High school students’ perceptions of race and gender representation in STEM. Science Education, 105(6), 1076–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21677
Master, A. (2021). Gender stereotypes influence children’s STEM motivation. Child Development Perspectives, 15(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12424
Roqib, M. (2021). Increasing social class through Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(2), 305–329.
Rosenzweig, S. C. (2025). Partisan law enforcement and extremist violence: Evidence from U.S. sheriffs. Political Research Quarterly, 78(3), 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129251334100
Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Rutkowski, D. J. (2025). Embracing complexity: Abductive reasoning as a versatile tool for analyzing international large-scale assessments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 37(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-024-09449-2
Schunk, D. H., Berger, E. M., Hermes, H., Winkel, K., & Fehr, E. (2022). Teaching self-regulation. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(12), 1680–1690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01449-w
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Vollet, J. W., & Rickert, N. P. (2022). Complex social ecologies and the development of academic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2129–2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09714-0
Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), Article 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
Tyarakanita, A., Drajati, N. A., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Nurkamto, J. (2021). The representation of gender stereotypes in Indonesian English language textbooks. Sexuality & Culture, 25(3), 1140–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09813-0
Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
Vo, H., & Ho, H. (2024). Online learning environment and student engagement: The mediating role of expectancy and task value beliefs. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(5), 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00689-1
Vu, M. T., & Pham, T. T. T. (2025). Gender, critical pedagogy, and textbooks: Understanding teachers’ (lack of) mediation of the hidden curriculum in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 29(7), 3143–3169. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221136937
Wang, X., Dai, M., & Short, K. M. (2024). One size doesn’t fit all: How different types of learning motivations influence engineering undergraduate students’ success outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00502-6
Wolff, K., Hattingh, T., & Smith, L. (2025). Global challenges, local responses: Exploring curriculum reform in South African engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 114(3), Article e70006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.70006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nasha Indri Fazila, Nurdiansyah, Jennyta Caturiasari (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.