Contextualizing of Technology Issues in Anthropology Learning: Efforts to Strengthen Social Concern in The Digital Era

Lisna Sandora; Nissya  Febrizani

doi:10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.170

Authors

Lisna Sandora Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia Indonesia Author
Nissya Febrizani Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.170

Keywords:

Anthropology learning, Contextual learning, Digital era, Social concern, Technology issues

Abstract

Anthropology learning in higher education is often constrained by theoretical instruction and limited contextual engagement, reducing students’ opportunities to connect anthropological concepts with contemporary social realities. This study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility of a Science, Technology, and Society (STS)-based Anthropology learning model to strengthen students’ social concern in Islamic higher education. Using a Research and Development design with an evaluative orientation, the study was conducted through three stages: needs analysis, model development, and expert validation. Data were collected through classroom observation, Semester Learning Plan analysis, structured interviews, social concern questionnaires, documentation, and expert validation sheets. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings show that Anthropology learning requires a more contextual, participatory, and reflective structure that enables students to identify technology-related social issues, analyze them through anthropological concepts, and reflect on their ethical and social implications. The developed model consists of issue identification, concept formation, field application, social concern development, reporting of findings, and assessment. Its supporting products include a model book, lecturer guidebook, and student guidebook. The novelty of this study lies in extending the STS approach into Anthropology learning by positioning technology issues as social and cultural phenomena rather than merely technical matters. The model offers a structured pedagogical framework for linking conceptual understanding, field observation, ethical reflection, and social responsibility. Further classroom-based testing is recommended to examine its effectiveness in improving students’ social concern across broader higher education contexts.

References

Agustian, H. Y. (2025). The critical role of understanding epistemic practices in science teaching using wicked problems. Science & Education, 34(1), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00471-2

Barak, M. (2024). Educational ideals and classroom realities: Developing teachers’ concepts of dialogic pedagogy in real-world contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, 104401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104401

Begum, A., Liu, J., Qayum, H., & Mamdouh, A. (2022). Environmental and moral education for effective environmentalism: An ideological and philosophical approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), Article 15549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315549

Blasco, M., Langevang, T., & Jeppesen, S. (2022). Learning through disruptions: Equipping students to cope with challenging contexts through a field-based course in Africa. Journal of Management Education, 46(5), 853–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211072571

Brown, A., Lawrence, J., Basson, M., & Redmond, P. (2022). A conceptual framework to enhance student online learning and engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912

Doz, D., Žakelj, A., & Cotič, M. (2025). Inquiry-based learning in grade 9 mathematics: Assessing outcomes across Gagné’s taxonomy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 120(2), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10417-w

Enríquez, I. G., Cutuli, M. S., & Mancha-Cáceres, O. I. (2023). Enhancing collaborative learning in higher education through podcast production: An experiential approach with anthropology and tourism students. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090898

Firdaus, S. A., & Suwendi, S. (2025). Fostering social harmony: The impact of Islamic character education in multicultural societies. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1), 942–955. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6579

Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y

Getenet, S., Haeusler, C., Redmond, P., Cantle, R., & Crouch, V. (2024). First-year preservice teachers’ understanding of digital technologies and their digital literacy, efficacy, attitude, and online learning engagement: Implication for course design. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(3), 1359–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09724-z

Gozum, I. E. A., & Mendoza, J. K. T. (2026). Analyzing the UST-IR signature pedagogy (DoT-ED framework) vis-à-vis the constructivist and Thomistic philosophies of education. International Studies in Catholic Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19422539.2026.2618117

Islamic, G., Supriyono, Ishaq, M., & Dayati, U. (2024). Character education through philosophical values in traditional Islamic boarding schools. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(1), 31–42.

Jacobsen, M., & McKenney, S. (2024). Educational design research: Grappling with methodological fit. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2743–2762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10282-5

Küçük, E., Meral, B., Çalık, K. Y., & Çapık, C. (2025). The Turkish version of the Technology Acceptance Model-based scale TAME-ChatGPT: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(23), 14734–14745. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2487876

Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765

Marvell, A., & Simm, D. (2026). Crafting scholarship through utilising experiential learning during international fieldwork: Evolving pedagogies and lessons learnt. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2026.2627601

Moore, S. L., Howard, C. D., Boling, E., Leary, H., & Hodges, C. B. (2024). Research methods for design knowledge: Clarifying definitions, characteristics, and areas of confusion. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2679–2703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10271-8

N, B. B., & Muralidharan, S. (2026). Social Media, Cyberbullying, and Student Wellbeing: The Role of AI in Prevention. In Implications for Students’ Mental Health in the Digital Age: AI and Cyber Behavior (pp. 263–292). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4222-1.ch011

Ognibene, D., Wilkens, R., Taibi, D., Hernández-Leo, D., Kruschwitz, U., Donabauer, G., Theophilou, E., Lomonaco, F., Bursic, S., Lobo, R. A., Sánchez-Reina, J. R., Scifo, L., Schwarze, V., Börsting, J., Hoppe, U., Aprin, F., Malzahn, N., & Eimler, S. (2023). Challenging social media threats using collective well-being-aware recommendation algorithms and an educational virtual companion. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 654930. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.654930

Plessas, A., Paisi, M., Ahmed, N., Brookes, Z., Burns, L., & Witton, R. (2024). The impact of community engaged healthcare education on undergraduate students’ empathy and their views towards social accountability: A mixed methods systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 1490. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06367-1

Ramli, R., Razali, R., Gadeng, A. N., Diana, N., & Hariadi, J. (2025). Integrating local knowledge into higher education: A qualitative study of curriculum innovation in Aceh, Indonesia. Education Sciences, 15(9), Article 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091214

Ruggerio, C. A., Morales-Magaña, M., Paneque-Gálvez, J., & Suárez, F. M. (2024). Teaching–learning environmental conflicts through case studies and experiential immersion: Introducing students to transdisciplinary research. Sustainability Science, 19(3), 935–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01448-4

Tripon, C. (2024). Bridging horizons: Exploring STEM students’ perspectives on service-learning and storytelling activities for community engagement and gender equality. Trends in Higher Education, 3(2), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3020020

Wang, C.-C. (2024). Using design thinking for interdisciplinary curriculum design and teaching: A case study in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 307. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02813-z

Zheng, X., & Wang, A. (2026). Enhancing patient-centered communication in hemodialysis symptom management care-development and validation of the HSB-HD scale for assessing help-seeking behavior in hemodialysis patients: A multiphase cross-sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 2026(1), Article 8834451. https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/8834451