Spider-Web of Civilization: The Integrative–Interconnective Paradigm of Islamic Education in the Thought of Muhammad Amin Abdullah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.169Keywords:
Contemporary civilization, Integrative-interconnective paradigm, Islamic education, Spider web paradigmAbstract
Contemporary Islamic education faces a persistent epistemological challenge caused by the dichotomy between religious sciences and modern sciences. This separation limits its capacity to respond to complex civilizational issues that require textual understanding, empirical inquiry, social analysis, and philosophical reflection. This study aims to analyze M. Amin Abdullah’s integrative-interconnective paradigm by positioning the spider web metaphor as a conceptual framework for reconstructing Islamic education and strengthening its contribution to contemporary Islamic civilization. Using a qualitative library research design, this study examined Abdullah’s major work on integrative-interconnective Islamic studies as the primary corpus, supported by his other writings and relevant scholarly literature on Islamic education, epistemology, knowledge integration, and civilizational renewal. Data were collected through documentation and critical literature review, then analyzed using content analysis and conceptual analysis. The findings show that the integrative-interconnective paradigm reframes the dichotomy of knowledge as an epistemological problem rather than merely a curricular issue. The spider web metaphor presents knowledge as a relational network in which religious sciences, social sciences, humanities, natural sciences, and philosophy interact dialogically. The study further identifies hadārat al-nass, hadārat al-‘ilm, and hadārat al-falsafah as mutually corrective domains that integrate textual authority, empirical inquiry, and critical reflection. Through conceptual synthesis, this study extends Abdullah’s paradigm from an epistemological model into a civilizational framework for Islamic education. It concludes that the spider web paradigm provides a strong foundation for curriculum reconstruction, interdisciplinary learning, research culture, institutional transformation, and the formation of a knowledge-based Islamic civilization.
References
Abdullah, M. A. (2014). Religion, science, and culture: An integrated, interconnected paradigm of science. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 52(1), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2014.521.175-203
Abdullah, MA (2006). Studi Islam di perguruan tinggi: Pendekatan integratif-interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.
Adiyono, A., Ni’am, S., & Akhyak, A. (2024). Methodology of Islamic studies: Islam as religion (A perspective epistemology, paradigm, and methodology). Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 24(1), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v24i1.22636
Alsuhaymi, A. O., & Atallah, F. A. (2025). The role of ritual prayer (ṣalāh) in self-purification and identity formation: An Islamic educational perspective. Religions, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16111347
Ashraf, A., Saeed, H. M., & Awan, M. I. (2023). Muslims scientists’ works and the Western approach: A short review. AL-IDA’AT Research Journal, 3(2). https://alasr.com.pk/ojs3308/index.php/alidaat/article/view/146
Bhat, A. M., & Bisati, A. A. (2025). Rationality in the Qur’an: Integrating reason and revelation for contemporary Islamic education. Dirasah International Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v3i1.40
Chande, A. (2023). Global politics of knowledge production: The challenges of Islamization of knowledge in the light of tradition vs secular modernity debate. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v6i2.3502
Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., & Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The science of literature reviews: Searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising. Publications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002
Ediyanto, E., Çakır, G. K., Wong, L. H., Muslihati, M., Ben, F., & Setiyowati, A. J. (Eds.). (2025). Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Educational Management and Technology (ICEMT 2024). Springer Nature.
Fancy, N., Stearns, J., Brentjes, S., Şen, A. T., Trigg, S., Gardiner, N., Varlık, N., Melvin-Koushki, M., & Haq, S. N. (2023). Current debates and emerging trends in the history of science in premodern Islamicate societies. History of Science, 61(2), 123–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00732753231154690
Fife, S. T., & Gossner, J. D. (2024). Deductive qualitative analysis: Evaluating, expanding, and refining theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, Article 16094069241244856. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241244856
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
Jalaldeen, J., & Al-Hidabi, D. (2025). Al-Ghazali’s framework of teachings professional values: Analyzing the pedagogical principles in Islamic education. Al-Burhān: Journal of Qurʾān and Sunnah Studies, 9(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.31436/alburhn.v9i1.363
Jauzaa’, N. A.-Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2025). Scientific integration of perspectives M. Amin Abdullah (integrative-interconnective approach). Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 8(1), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i1.1023
Jenuri, Faqihuddin, A., Suresman, E., & Abdullah, M. (2025). Overcoming the spiritual emptiness of students in the modern era through the integration of Al-Ghazali’s human concepts in the Islamic religious education learning model. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2497147. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2497147
Lutfi, M., Zamzami, M., A’la, A., & Nisa, K. (2025). Religious science and scientific religion: Reimagining religion-science relations in contemporary Indonesian Muslim thought. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 15(1), 172–204. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2025.15.1.172-204
Masuku, M. (2024). Library and information science and the positivist paradigm: Some critical reflections. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(3), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231161324
Mat Zin, S., Adnan, A., Che Mat, R., & My. (2022). Intellectual capital and Bumiputera SME performance: A methodological triangulation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i3/12213
Moslimany, R., Otaibi, A., & Shaikh, F. (2024). Designing a holistic curriculum: Challenges and opportunities in Islamic education. Journal on Islamic Studies, 1(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.35335/beztg009
Palahniuk, M., & Fomin, K. (2023). Development of the world view and values of technical university students in the context of spiritual and moral education. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 10(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.10.1.99-107
Qadafy, M. Z., & Yunita. (2025). Just a philomath, not a polymath: Did the paradigm of integration-interconnection of sciences obscure or illuminate the study of the Qur’an and tafsir in academic institution? Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 26(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i1.5790
Rahmani, D. A., Najmi, V. N., & Dewi, E. (2026). Reconstructing Islamic epistemology: A philosophical analysis of Amin Abdullah’s integrative–interconnected paradigm. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 11(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.25299/althariqah.2026.vol11(1).27798
Riwanda, A. (2023). Comparative typology of science and religion integration of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas and Amin Abdullah and its implications for Islamic education. Journal of Islamic Civilization, 5(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.33086/jic
Shaleh, M., Tobroni, Mundir, & Umiarso. (2024). Development of a holistic-integrative Islamic religious education curriculum in an integrated Islamic school. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 113, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2024.113.13
Shameed, M. (2026). Decolonising Indian sociology: Revisiting colonial legacies, caste hierarchies, and subaltern epistemologies in the works of Ghurye, Srinivas, and Aiyappan. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, Article 103044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103044
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ngatmin Abbas, Khafidoh, Muhammad Umar Al Faroq, Abdullah, Ahmadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.