Educational Institutions and Religious Identity Polarization: Toward an Educational Anti-Polarization Framework

Authors

  • Suwardi Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author
  • Abdurrahman R. Mala Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6238-7392
  • Tuharso Institut Agama Islam Bakti Negara, Tegal, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author
  • Hasyim Mahmud Wantu Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6535-4571
  • Firman Sidik Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author
  • Nur Gamar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4726-6617
  • Najamuddin Petta Solong Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia Indonesia Flag Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7908-3180

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.132

Keywords:

Educational Institutions, Religious Identity Polarization, Social Cohesion, Tolerance Education, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Religious identity polarization has become an increasingly significant challenge for social cohesion in pluralistic societies. Educational institutions are frequently regarded as strategic spaces for fostering tolerance, promoting intergroup understanding, and preventing the development of exclusionary identities. This study aimed to systematically examine the role of educational institutions in preventing religious identity polarization and to identify the contextual conditions that support the effectiveness of such efforts. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA framework. Literature searches were performed across Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and SINTA databases, focusing on studies published between 2019 and 2025. From an initial pool of 284 records, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed four interconnected educational mechanisms that contribute to preventing religious identity polarization: inclusive curricula, dialogical pedagogical approaches, heterogeneous educational environments, and digital media literacy. The review also identified five key conditions that enhance effectiveness, namely institutional leadership commitment, educator capacity, policy consistency, family and community involvement, and evidence-based program implementation. Drawing upon Social Identity Theory, Intergroup Contact Theory, Social Capital Theory, and digital polarization perspectives, the study proposes an Educational Anti-Polarization Framework that conceptualizes educational institutions as multilevel systems shaping cognitive, social, pedagogical, and digital dimensions of identity formation. The findings highlight the importance of integrated educational strategies for strengthening social cohesion and fostering inclusive citizenship in increasingly diverse and digitally connected societies.

References

AlAfnan, M. A., & Al, M. (2024). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Teaching, learning, and assessing in the information and artificial intelligence era. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(4), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n4p173

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

Azmira, T. (2026). Multicultural Islamic Education Curriculum and Social Cohesion: Negotiating Religious Identity in Diverse Communities. Multicultural Islamic Education Review, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.23917/mier.v4i1.16875

Banks, J. A. (2021). Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives. Jossey-Bass.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Dharma, Y., Seneru, W., & Obi, S. N. (2025). The Role of Communication in Building Tolerance and Unity in a Diverse Society: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Communication, Religious, and Social Sciences (JoCRSS), 3(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.60046/jocrss.v3i1.219

Engeness, I. (2021). Developing teachers' digital identity: Towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students' learning in the 21st century. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1849129

Fukuyama, F. (2022). Liberalism and its discontents. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Hällgren, C., & Björk, Å. (2023). Young people's identities in digital worlds. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2022-0135

Hanushek, E. A. (2021). Addressing cross-national generalizability in educational impact evaluation. International Journal of Educational Development, 80, 102318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102318

Hidayat, R., & Noor, M. A. (2022). Kompetensi guru pendidikan agama Islam dalam memfasilitasi dialog antaragama di sekolah menengah: Sebuah kajian kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 145–168.

Ismail, N. H., & Abdullah, M. R. (2023). Multicultural education in Muslim-majority schools: Evidence from Malaysia and Indonesia. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 44(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v44i1953

Latief, M., & Anwar, S. (2022). Kebijakan zonasi sekolah dan heterogenitas keagamaan: Implikasi terhadap toleransi antarsiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 112–131.

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2023). Tyranny of the minority: Why American democracy reached the breaking point. Crown.

Malešević, S. (2022). Why humans fight: The social dynamics of close-range violence. Cambridge University Press.

Muhtadi, B. (2023). Populisme Islam dan demokrasi di Indonesia: Transformasi politik identitas pasca-reformasi. Mizan.

Mutaqin, Z. (2021). Kapital simbolik dan otoritas keagamaan: Sosiologi ulama di era digital. LP3ES.

Napal, M., Mendióroz-Lacambra, A. M., & Peñalva, A. (2020). Sustainability teaching tools in the digital age. Sustainability, 12(8), 3366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083366

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2023). Global competence and future-ready education: Policy perspectives for inclusive societies. OECD Publishing.

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Putnam, R. D., & Garrett, S. R. (2020). The upswing: How America came together a century ago and how we can do it again. Simon & Schuster.

Ramadhan, F., Hasan, B., & Syamsuddin, M. (2023). Program kuliah kerja nyata lintas kampus sebagai ruang dialog kebangsaan: Studi di Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(1), 33–52.

Setara Institute. (2022). Laporan tahunan kebebasan beragama dan berkeyakinan di Indonesia 2022. Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Suprayogo, I., & Wahib, A. (2022). Kurikulum pesantren dan pembentukan toleransi antaragama: Studi kasus di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Studi Islam, 23(1), 78–99.

Suryana, Y., & Rusdiana, A. (2021). Pendidikan multikultural terintegrasi dan sikap toleransi siswa sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 215–234.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Education for inclusion and social cohesion. UNESCO Publishing.

Verkuyten, M., Mepham, K., & Kros, M. (2022). Political tolerance and prejudice: An intergroup relations perspective. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211016398

Wahid Foundation. (2022). Survei nasional tentang toleransi dan keberagaman di Indonesia 2022. Wahid Foundation.

Wahyudi, T., & Mujib, A. (2023). Metode pembelajaran dialogis dan penurunan prasangka antaragama pada siswa sekolah menengah di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 13(2), 89–107.

Zaluchu, S. E., Widodo, P., & Kriswanto, A. (2025). Conceptual reconstruction of religious moderation in the Indonesian context based on previous research: Bibliometric analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101552

Zuly Qodir dan Wijayanto. (2022). Politik Identitas, Polarisasi, dan Demokrasi Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Suwardi, Abdurrahman R. Mala, Tuharso, Hasyim Mahmud Wantu, Firman Sidik, Nur Gamar, Najamuddin Petta Solong (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.