Organizational Ambidexterity Management Model in Pesantren-Based Islamic Educational Institutions in the Disruptive Era: Integrating the Exploitation of Tradition and the Exploration of Institutional Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i3.319Keywords:
Organizational Ambidexterity, Pesantren-Based Islamic Education, Tradition Exploitation, Institutional Innovation, Kyai LeadershipAbstract
This study examines how a pesantren-based Islamic educational institution manages the tension between institutional continuity and innovation through organizational ambidexterity. A qualitative single-case study was conducted at Pesantren ATQIA, Kademangan, Bondowoso, from March to June 2026. Sixteen informants were selected purposively from the board of caretakers, pesantren administrators, teachers, dormitory administrators, and senior santri. Data were generated through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis, and were analyzed using the interactive process of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The findings show that ambidexterity was organized through five connected mechanisms. First, tradition operated as an organizational anchor that maintained identity, values, culture, and institutional legitimacy. Second, kyai leadership functioned as a strategic filter and balancing mechanism that assessed the compatibility of proposed changes with pesantren values. Third, educational practice combined continuity in substantive values with adaptation in methods, media, and strategies. Fourth, structural and relational integration connected stable role arrangements with coordination, feedback, and organizational learning. These mechanisms supported a dynamic process of tradition exploitation, strategic filtering, innovation exploration, organizational learning, and institutionalization. The study contributes a context-sensitive model of organizational ambidexterity in which tradition is treated as an adaptive resource rather than as the opposite of innovation. Because the evidence derives from one pesantren, the model is offered as an analytically grounded explanation of this case rather than as a statistically generalizable pattern.
References
AlKhamees, S. B., & Durugbo, C. M. (2025). Organisational ambidexterity and innovation: A systematic review and unified model of ‘CODEC’ management priorities. Management Review Quarterly, 75(4), 3813–3887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00474-5
Annosi, M. C., Mattarelli, E., Dentoni, D., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2024). The micro-foundations of ambidexterity for corporate social performance: A study on sustainability managers’ response to conflicting goals. Long Range Planning, 57(1), 102412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102412
Avby, G. (2022). An integrative learning approach: Combining improvement methods and ambidexterity. The Learning Organization, 29(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-10-2021-0127
Badu, D. A., & Micheli, P. (2025). How performance measurement systems enable or hinder organizational ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 45(1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2023-0591
Belik, I., & Knudsen, E. S. (2023). Link on, link off: Data-driven management of organizational networks for ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113555
Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.07.003
Çoban, Ö., Yalçın, M. T., Özdemir, N., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2026). Exploring the moderator role of organisational ambidexterity in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher instructional practices. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 54(3), 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241291193
Cozzolino, A., & Verona, G. (2024). Decision tree for adaptation after radical changes: Linking dynamic capabilities, ambidexterity, and strategic alliances. Journal of Management & Governance, 28(3), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-024-09702-2
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
Da’as, R. (2024). Leadership for school mindfulness: The role of school ambidexterity and leaders’ cognitive complexity. Research Papers in Education, 39(6), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2023.2243468
Darwanto, A., Prahmana, R. C. I., Susanti, A., & Khalil, I. A. (2024). Transformation of boarding school management models in enhancing student accessibility and educational quality. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.8632
Gianzina, O., & Paroutis, S. (2025). Ambidextrous leadership: A systematic review and roadmap for future research. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115151
Guo, T., Zhang, D., Yang, J., & Xia, J. (2025). Exploring how the ambidextrous leadership influences knowledge workers innovative behavior: A two stage SEM-ANN analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1560726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560726
Gupta, S., Modgil, S., Wong, C. W. Y., & Kar, A. K. (2023). The role of innovation ambidexterity on the relationship between cognitive computing capabilities and entrepreneurial quality: A comparative study of India and China. Technovation, 127, 102835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102835
He, X., Wu, X., Croasdell, D., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Dynamic capability, ambidexterity and social network: Empirical evidence from SMEs in China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(6), 958–974. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2020-0181
Humaydiy, A. A., Arifudin, I., & Gloria, R. Y. (2026). Digital transformation of Islamic boarding schools in Indonesia: Modernization, innovation, and value preservation. IJGIE (International Journal of Graduate of Islamic Education), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.37567/ijgie.v7i2.4780
Jain, S., Badra, S., & Vichore, S. (2025). Assessing ambidextrous leadership in organizations: Review and future scope for research. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(8), 2370–2399. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2024-4373
Jöhnk, J., Ollig, P., Rövekamp, P., & Oesterle, S. (2022). Managing the complexity of digital transformation: How multiple concurrent initiatives foster hybrid ambidexterity. Electronic Markets, 32, 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00510-2
Johnston, A., Woodhouse, D., & Wells, P. (2025). University ambidexterity: Assessing the nature of interdependence between knowledge exchange and knowledge creation in UK universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(3), 1297–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10137-y
Kjellström, S., Areskoug Josefsson, K., Fabisch, A., Forsberg, C., Schneider, T., & Avby, G. (2022). Fostering exploration and exploitation behavior in management teams to enhance organizational performance: The LearnOvation leadership development program. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(3), 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2021-0162
Martínez-Román, J. A., Gamero, J., Tamayo, J. A., & Delgado-González, M. L. (2025). Empirical analysis of the technological exploration-exploitation balance and its impact on organizational performance under uncertainty. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 221. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04476-w
Mavroudi, E., Kesidou, E., & Pandza, K. (2023). Effects of ambidextrous and specialized R&D strategies on firm performance: The contingent role of industry orientation. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113353
Mei, L., Rentocchini, F., & Chen, J. (2023). Antecedents of strategic ambidexterity in firms’ product innovation: External knowledge and internal information sharing. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(6), 2849–2878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1944635
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Möller, K., Schmid, F., Seehofer, T. M., & Wenig, P. (2022). How the design of an organizational context helps to attain contextual ambidexterity. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 74(4), 603–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-022-00142-y
Novebri, N., Kurniady, D. A., Komariah, A., & Suryana, A. (2025). Digital innovation and curriculum reform in Islamic boarding schools of Serambi Mekah: Balancing tradition and modernity. Tadbir: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(2), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v9i2.12961
Ochie, C., Nyuur, R. B., Ludwig, G., & Cunningham, J. A. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and organizational ambidexterity: New strategies from emerging market multinational enterprises in Nigeria. Thunderbird International Business Review, 64(5), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22266
Pereira, V., Del Giudice, M., Malik, A., Tarba, S., Temouri, Y., Budhwar, P., & Patnaik, S. (2021). A longitudinal investigation into multilevel agile & ambidextrous strategic dualities in an information technology high performing EMNE. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120848
Pietsch, M., Aydin, B., Montecinos, C., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2025a). Organizational ambidexterity and student achievement: Do knowledge exploration and exploitation in schools make a difference? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(1), 100636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100636
Pietsch, M., Buyukgoze, H., Gümüş, S., Çoban, Ö., & Özdemir, N. (2025b). Unpacking the microfoundations of educational innovation and change: A multi-level study of ambidexterity, commitment, and trust using Coleman’s bathtub model. Public Management Review, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2582610
Pratama, R., Yaakob, M. F. M., Hendra, R., & Wulandari, O. (2024). Innovation capacity in the management system of Islamic boarding school education institutions: Quality test of instruments through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Jurnal Paedagogy, 11(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i2.10744
Raalskov, J., Schlichter, J., Haug, A., & Klyver, K. (2024). Organizational ambidexterity in young SMEs? The incompatibility of entrepreneurial orientation and process improvement. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 36(7–8), 1096–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2310112
Roth, L., Corsi, S., & Hughes, M. (2024). Ambidexterity within a multinational context: How organisations can leverage explorative and exploitative reverse innovation. R&D Management, 54(3), 628–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12668
Salim, N. A., Zaibi, M., Brantasari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Aslindah, A. (2025). Islamic boarding school leadership innovation: From traditional to modernization of education. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(4), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v5i4.1392
Seo, D., Bryson, J. M., & Williams, M. (2026). Nonprofit sector ambidexterity: A framework for understanding innovation and strategy change in nonprofit organizations. Public Management Review, 28(3), 655–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2452880
Ugwuanyi, C. S., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Pietsch, M. (2025). Leader-member exchange and teacher creativity in Nigerian schools: The mediating role of paradox mindset and individual ambidexterity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2539804
van Lieshout, J. W. F. C., van der Velden, J. M., Blomme, R. J., & Peters, P. (2021). The interrelatedness of organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities and open innovation: A conceptual model towards a competitive advantage. European Journal of Management Studies, 26(2/3), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMS-01-2021-0007
Waziroh, I., Fuadi, I., Kholis, N., Adiyono, & Kandiri. (2026). Sustaining Islamic values through institutional innovation: A case study of an Indonesian vocational pesantren. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 10(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v10i1.255
Xi, Y., Zhou, L., & Wang, H. (2025). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation: A process perspective and an experimental approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 612. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04922-9
Xia, J., Zhang, M. M., Zhu, J. C., & Fan, D. (2024). Reconciling multiple institutional logics for ambidexterity: Human resource management reforms in Chinese public universities. Higher Education, 87, 611–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01027-7
Yunita, T., Sasmoko, Bandur, A., & Alamsjah, F. (2023). Organizational ambidexterity: The role of technological capacity and dynamic capabilities in the face of environmental dynamism. Heliyon, 9(4), e14817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14817
Yunita, T., Sasmoko, Bandur, A., & Alamsjah, F. (2024). Dynamic capabilities facilitate the use of technology to promote organizational ambidexterity. Business: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2024.18998
Zain, R. D. C., Suhariadi, F., & Mitra Uktutias, S. A. (2025). How does ambidextrous leadership influence innovative work behavior and employee performance in public service: A study of immigration offices? Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2480241. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2480241
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wafi Ali Hajjaj (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
