Association Between the Quality of the Islamic Education Management Information System and Madrasah Administrative Efficiency at MA Imam Ibnu Katsir Pekanbaru

Nasril; Fahrina Yustiasari  Liriwati; Zulhimma; Zulhammi; Ali  Pirdaus

doi:10.53515/alqodiri.v24i3.275

Authors

Nasril Universitas Syekh Maulana Qori Jambi, Indonesia Indonesia Author
Fahrina Yustiasari Liriwati STAI Auliaurrasyidin Tembilahan Riau, Indonesia Indonesia Author
Zulhimma Universitas Islam Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padang Sidempuan Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Indonesia Co Author
Zulhammi Universitas Islam Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padang Sidempuan Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Indonesia Co Author
Ali Pirdaus Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Syaifuddin Jambi, Indonesia Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i3.275

Keywords:

Islamic Education, Management Information System, Information System Quality, Madrasah Administrative Efficiency, Madrasah Aliyah, Educational Administration

Abstract

Background of Study: Digital information systems can streamline educational administration, but the presence of technology alone does not guarantee efficient services. Aims and Scope of Paper: This study examined the statistical association between the quality of the Islamic Education Management Information System and madrasah administrative efficiency at MA Imam Ibnu Katsir Pekanbaru. Methods: A quantitative explanatory survey was conducted with a population of 344 students. A sample of 185 students was determined using the Slovin formula with a 5% margin of error and was selected using the random sampling procedure reported in the original study. Data were collected with two 15-item, five-point Likert scales measuring perceived information-system quality and madrasah administrative efficiency. Item validity, Cronbach's alpha reliability, descriptive statistics, assumption tests, and simple linear regression were analyzed in IBM SPSS Statistics 29. Results: Perceived information-system quality was high (M = 4.10, SD = 0.47), as was madrasah administrative efficiency (M = 4.07, SD = 0.50). Regression analysis indicated a positive association between the two variables (B = 0.670, beta = 0.689, t = 12.846, p < .001), and the model explained 47.5% of the variance in administrative efficiency (R2 = .475). Conclusion: Within this madrasah and from the students' perspective, better perceived information-system quality was associated with more efficient administrative services. The result supports the practical value of reliable systems, accurate information, responsive service, ease of use, and data security, while the survey design does not establish causality.

References

Abumalloh, R. A., Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Nayer, F. K., Samad, S., Mohd, S., & Ibrahim, O. (2021). The impact of coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) on education: The role of virtual and remote laboratories in education. Technology in Society, 67, 101728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101728

Alam, G. M., & Parvin, M. (2021). Can online higher education be an active agent for change? Comparison of academic success and job-readiness before and during COVID-19. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121008

Alfaki, I. A. (2021). DeLone and McLean information systems success model in a blended-learning context. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa18

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Bisri, A., Putri, A., & Rosmansyah, Y. (2023). A systematic literature review on digital transformation in higher education: Revealing key success factors. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(14), 164-187. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.40201

Cachia, R., Pokropek, A., & Giannoutsou, N. (2024). Supporting the monitoring of the digital capacity of schools through optimal shortening of the SELFIE tool. Computers & Education, 208, 104938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104938

Castro Benavides, L. M., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291

Çelik, K., & Ayaz, A. (2022). Validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model: A study on student information system. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 4709-4727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10798-4

Costa, P., Castaño-Muñoz, J., & Kampylis, P. (2021). Capturing schools’ digital capacity: Psychometric analyses of the SELFIE self-reflection tool. Computers & Education, 162, 104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104080

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Fernández, A., Gómez, B., Binjaku, K., & Kajo Meçe, E. (2023). Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12351-12382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0

Gong, C., & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102, 102217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217

Gürkut, C., Elçi, A., & Nat, M. (2023). An enriched decision-making satisfaction model for student information management systems. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100195

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hii, P. K., Goh, C. F., Tan, O. K., Rasli, A., & Ong, C. H. (2023). An information system success model for e-learning postadoption using the fuzzy analytic network process. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10731-10752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11621-y

Jauhari, I. (2021). Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Tarbawi Ngabar: Jurnal of Education, 2(2), 190-208. https://doi.org/10.51772/tarbawi.v2i2.130

Khatir, N., & Madani, H. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on achieving outstanding performance in educational administration. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(7), 1821-1838. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2023-0289

Khoirohnissah, D. (2023). Digital transformation in Indonesian religious education: A case study of madrasah management at Kemenag Sleman. Journal of Islamic Education Management Research, 1(2), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.14421/jiemr.2023.12-10

Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466

Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of response options, reliability, validity, and potential bias in the use of the Likert scale education and social science research: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625-637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625

Legramante, D., Azevedo, A., & Azevedo, J. M. (2023). Integration of the technology acceptance model and the information systems success model in the analysis of Moodle’s satisfaction and continuity of use. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(5), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2022-0231

McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Mijač, T., Jadrić, M., & Ćukušić, M. (2024). Measuring the success of information systems in higher education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 18323-18360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12564-8

Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 233-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-62. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401

Ramírez Aristizábal, C., & Moraes, R. de O. (2024). Learning management systems success in the COVID-19 post-pandemic blended learning context: Empirical evidence from a Brazilian engineering school. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 16541-16570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12518-0

Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Alshammari, S. H., Ibrahim, M. M., Atan, A. S., & Atan, N. A. (2021). Improving questionnaire reliability using construct reliability for researches in educational technology. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(4), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i04.20199

Rulinawaty, Samboteng, L., Purwanto, A. J., Kuncoro, S., Jasrial, Tahilili, M. H., Efendi, Y., & Karyana, A. (2024). Investigating the influence of the updated DeLone and McLean information system (IS) success model on the effectiveness of learning management system (LMS) implementation. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2365611. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2365611

Sayaf, A. M. (2023). Adoption of e-learning systems: An integration of ISSM and constructivism theories in higher education. Heliyon, 9(2), e13014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13014

Shobri, M. (2024). Peran sistem informasi manajemen pendidikan dalam meningkatkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas di lembaga pendidikan Islam. AKSI: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.37348/aksi.v2i2.302

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Villagrá Sobrino, S., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Martínez Monés, A., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6695-6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Wang, Y.-M., Wei, C.-L., Chen, W.-J., & Wang, Y.-S. (2024). Revisiting the e-learning systems success model in the post-COVID-19 age: The role of monitoring quality. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(18), 5087-5102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2231278

Wei, C.-L., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H.-H., Wang, Y.-S., & Huang, J.-L. (2022). Developing and validating a business simulation systems success model in the context of management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100634

Zhao, L., Cao, C., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Determinants of the digital outcome divide in e-learning between rural and urban students: Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic based on capital theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, 107177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107177